|
|
Fred A. Baughman Jr. MD
Neurology Child Neurology (board certified)
Fellow, American Academy of Neurology
1303 Hidden Mountain Drive
El Cajon, CA 92019
619 440 8236 (phone)
619 442 1932 (fax)
fredbaughmanmd@cox.net
Letters Editor, JAMA November 5, 2002
515 N. State Street
Chicago, IL 60610
also to: JAMA-letters@ama-assn.org
also to: fax 312 464 5824
Re:
Developmental Trajectories of Brain Volume Abnormalities in Children and
Adolescents With Attention- Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
F. Xavier Castellanos, MD ; Patti P. Lee, MD; Wendy Sharp, MSW; Neal O.
Jeffries, PhD; Deanna K. Greenstein, PhD; Liv S. Clasen, PhD; Jonathan D.
Blumenthal, MA; Regina S. James, MD; Christen L. Ebens, BA; James M. Walter, MA;
Alex Zijdenbos, PhD; Alan C. Evans, PhD; Jay N. Giedd, MD; Judith L. Rapoport,
MD JAMA. 2002;288:1740-1748
To the Editor:
CHADD, funded by Ciba/Novartis, maker of Ritalin, calls ADHD a brain disease.
NIMH researchers, Castellanos included, dominate CHADD’s “national professional
advisory board” and sanction the “disease” pronouncement.
Nasrallah [1] scanned (CT) adult males treated for childhood hyperactivity and
concluded: “cortical atrophy may be a long-term adverse effect of this
treatment.”
Despite the fact that all subject-groups were stimulant-treated,
researchers—mainly from the NIMH--continued to represent the brain atrophy
[2-16] as proof that ADHD was a disease, avoiding the study of drug-naïve
groups.
In 1996, Castellanos [16] stated: “A replication study with stimulant-naïve boys
with ADHD is under way.” Such a study never appeared.
At the 1998, Consensus Conference, Swanson (presenting) and Castellanos [17]
summarized: “Recent investigations provide converging evidence that a refined
phenotype of ADHD/HKD (hyperkinetic disorder) is characterized by reduced size
in specific neuroanatomical regions…”
Baughman asked [18] : “Dr. Swanson, why didn’t you mention that virtually all of
the ADHD subjects in the neuroimaging studies have been on chronic stimulant
therapy and that this is the likely cause of their brain atrophy?”
Swanson: “…this is a critical issue…I am planning a study to investigate that.”
With the “epidemic” 4.4 million, the final statement of Consensus Conference
Panel [19], read: “...we do not have an independent, valid test for ADHD, and
there are no data to indicate that ADHD is due to a brain malfunction.”
From Readers Digest, January, 2000 [20]: “Castellanos and his group found three
areas of the brain to be significantly smaller in ADHD kids…Some critics claim
that such brain differences…might actually be caused by Ritalin…To address this,
Castellanos has now embarked on another study, imaging the brains of ADHD
youngsters who have not been treated with drugs.” .
Why then, did Castellanos co-mingle treated and un-treated ADHD subjects?
Why the Castellanos failure to reference Bartzokis [21] who found brain atrophy
in amphetamine addicts, suggesting, that stimulants, not the never-validated
disease, ADHD, causes the brain atrophy?
Subjects were said to have DSM-IV [22]-defined, ADHD. How could this be true
when the study spanned 1991-2001 and the DSM-IV was not published until 1994?
On March 1, 2000, Castellanos [23] wrote me: “The anatomic MRI study you asked
about …was begun approximately 4 years ago; it is approaching completion.”
Nineteen-ninety-six, not 1991? When was it changed? Why?
Pam [24], wrote: “If each emotion is not physiologically distinctive, there can
be no biological marker for each type or subtype of emotional pathology …the
preponderance of research contributed by biological psychiatry up to the present
is questionable or even invalidated by the criticisms just made.”
Here, is the essence of the fraud of “biological psychiatry”: no matter how
troubled or troublesome the individual, there are no physical
abnormalities/diseases-- And yet psychiatric research applies every bio-medical
technology, as if there were; the stuff of their pseudo-scientific literature,
referring to their every entity as a “disease.”
The irony is that they do find subtle, real, brain, abnormalities in almost all
such patients! But these are not due to ADHD, ODD, PTSD, or any other DSM,
invented disease--they are due to the few or several psychiatric drugs such
persons are invariably put on the moment they become psychiatric “patients.”
Castellanos has not proved that ADHD is a real disease, or that the
psycho-stimulants are not the cause of the brain atrophy. He will not prove a
thing until he renounces the pseudo-science of “biological psychiatry.”
Not a single psychiatric “disease” has been validated as such. The physical
complications of psychiatric conditions can only be due to their “treatments.”
Sincerely,
Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Nasrallah H, et al [1986] Cortical atrophy in young adults with a history of
hyperactivity in childhood. Psychiatric Research, 1986;17:241-246.
2. Hynd GW, Semrud-Clikeman M, Lorys AR, et al. Corpus callosum morphology in
attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: morphometric analysis of MRI. J Learn
Disabil.1991;24:141-146.
3. Giedd JN, Castellanos FX, Casey BJ, et al.Quantitative morphology of the
corpus callosum in Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Am J
Psychiatry.1994;151:665-669.
4. Semrud-Clikeman M, Filipek PA, Biederman J, et al. Attention-deficit
hyperactivity disorder: magnetic resonance imaging morphometric analysis of the
corpus callosum. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry.1994;33:875-881.
5. Baumgardner TL, Singer HS, Denckla MB, et al. Corpus callosum morphology in
children with Tourette syndrome and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Neurology. 1996;47:477-482.
6. Lyoo IK, Noam GG, Lee CK, et al. The corpus callosum and lateral ventricles
in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a brain magnetic
resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry.1996;40:1060-1063.
7. Hynd GW, Semrud-Clikeman M, Lorys AR, et al. Brain morphology in
developmental dyslexia and attention deficit disorder/hyperactivity. Arch
Neurol.1990;47:919-926.
8. Filipek PA, Semrud-Clikeman M, Steingard RJ, et al. Volumetric MRI analysis
comparing attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and normal
controls.Neurology.1997;48:589-601.
9. Hynd GW, Hern KL, Novey ES, et al.Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
and asymmetry of the caudate nucleus.J Child Neurol.1993;8:339-347.
10. Castellanos FX, Giedd JN, Eckburg P, et al.Quantitative morphology of the
caudate nucleus in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Am J
Psychiatry.1994;151:1791-1796.
11. Aylward EH, Reiss AL, Reader MJ, et al.Basal ganglia volumes in children
with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.J Child Neurol.1996;11:112-115.
12. Castellanos FX, Giedd JN, Berquin PC, et al.Quantitative brain magnetic
resonance imaging in girls with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Arch
Gen Psychiatry.2001;58:289-295.
13. Berquin PC, Giedd JN, Jacobsen LK, et al.The cerebellum in
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a morphometric study.Neurology.
1998;50:1087-1093.
14. Mostofsky SH, Reiss AL, Lockhart P, Denckla MB.Evaluation of cerebellar size
in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.J Child Neurol.1998;13:434-439.
15. Baumeister AA, Hawkins MF.Incoherence of neuroimaging studies of attention
deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Clin Neuropharmacol.2001;24:2-10.
16. Castellanos FX, Giedd JN, Marsh WL, et al.Quantitative brain magnetic
resonance imaging in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen
Psychiatry.1996;53:607-616.
17. Swanson J, Castellanos FX. Biological Basises of Attention Deficit
Hyperactivity Disorder. Invited presentation at the NIH, Consensus Development
Conference on ADHD, November 16-18, 1998.
18. Baughman FA (invited participant). Quote from videotape, NIH, Consensus
Conference on ADHD, November 16, 1998.
19. Final Statement of the Panel of the NIH, Consensus Conference on ADHD,
November 18, 1998.
20. John Pekkanen. Making Sense of Ritalin (interview with FX Castellanos).
Readers Digest, January, 2000:159-168.
21. Bartzokis G, Beckson M, Lu PH, Edwards N, Rapoport R, Wiseman E, Bridge P.
Age-related brain volume reductions in amphetamine and cocaine addicts and
normal controls: implications for addiction research. Psychiatry Res.
2000.10;98(2):93-102.
22. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, 4th edition. Washington, DC. 1994.
23. Castellanos, FX. Personal correspondence to Fred A Baughman, Jr., March 1,
2000.
24. Pam A. A critique of the scientific status of biological psychiatry. Acta
Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1990;82 (Supplement 362):1-35.
| • • • OISM Newsletter • • • |
|---|
Subscrine to OISM Newsletter and you’ll always be kept up to date via eMail on the news in the field of mental health and the struggle against psychiatry...
CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE!
|
|